Serveur d'exploration sur le nickel au Maghreb

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Sulfide Petrology of Spinel and Garnet Pyroxenite Layers from Mantle-derived Spinel Lherzolite Massifs of Arieg`, Northeastern Pyrenees, France

Identifieur interne : 001249 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 001248; suivant : 001250

Sulfide Petrology of Spinel and Garnet Pyroxenite Layers from Mantle-derived Spinel Lherzolite Massifs of Arieg`, Northeastern Pyrenees, France

Auteurs : J P. Lorand [France]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:11C6AD768DA78FAA05D5DE9F359A52301631A050

Abstract

Pyroxenite layers in the orogenic spinel lherzolite massifs of Ariège are porphyroclastic textured and range in composition from spinel websterite to garnet clinopyroxenite. Each pyroxenite type forms individual layers or occurs as part of composite layers in which the Opx/Cpx and Sp/Gt ratios decrease from margins to core. They are interpreted as crystalline segregations separated by flow crystallization from continental tholeiites en route to the surface. The primary magmatic phases consist of Al-rich pyroxenes, together with a minor amount of spinel, which started to crystallize at 1400°C and 20–22 kb pressure; the pyroxenes have locally survived plastic strains and subsolidus rccrystallizations and now occur in the form of clinopyroxene and orthopyroxene megacrysts displaying unmixing features. Although the differentiated silicate liquid was fully expelled during the flow crystallization process, the layered pyroxenites have concentrated the highly incompatible elements S and Cu and locally display significant chalcophile platinum-group element enrichment (Pd, Pt). Cu and S behave coherently over the whole range of pyroxenite composition; their highest concentrations are found in the thinnest websterite layers or at the margin of composite layers. Microscopic investigation of 214 polished thin sections shows these elements to be present as accessory Cu-Fe-Ni sulfides interstitial among the silicate phase or forming discrete bodies included in the relic pyroxene megacrysts. All these features indicate the presence of a sulfide liquid, immiscible with the silicate magma, during the crystallization of the layered pyroxenites. Sulfide liquid immiscibility probably occurred in response to thermal contrast between the pyroxenites and the cooler surrounding peridotites. It is proposed that the megacryst-hosted sulfide inclusions were trapped as linear arrays arranged on host megacryst growth planes. Due to the slow cooling and complex unmixing history of the megacrysts, these arrays have been transformed into coarse, isolated sulfide inclusions by subsolidus migration and spheroidization processes. They started to crystallize at T = 1200°C as monosulfide solid solution (MSS), probably coexisting with a minor amount of Ni- and Cu-rich sulfide liquid down to r=900°C. The reconstruction of the bulk chemistry of each individual inclusion reveals significant between-inclusion variations of Cu/Ni+ Fe and Ni/Fe ratios, which would result from strain-induced immobilization of these liquids. On cooling, the high-temperature MSS has decomposed below 230°C into Ni-rich pyrrhotite, nickeliferous pentlandite, chalcopyrite and minor pyrite. The post-magmatic history of the interstitial sulfide grains was not unlike that of the inclusions, except at near-surface temperatures where the primary sulfides resulting from unmixing of MSS have been partly altered into secondary sulfides by serpentinizing aqueous fluids. In spite of these post-magmatic alterations, the inclusions and the interstitial sulfide phases are remarkably homogeneous as regards their bulk Ni/Cu ratio, which is close to 3. This value is characteristic of sulfide separated from primary rather than partially differentiated tholeiitic melts. It is thus concluded that the continental tholeiite parent to the layered pyroxenites was saturated with sulfides when it left its mantle source regioa In this aspect, it would not be different from MORBs which contain similar sulfide compositions. In both cases, sulfide fractionation cannot be ignored in models for chalcophile trace element fractionation during initial evolution of these magmas.

Url:
DOI: 10.1093/petrology/30.4.987


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Sulfide Petrology of Spinel and Garnet Pyroxenite Layers from Mantle-derived Spinel Lherzolite Massifs of Arieg`, Northeastern Pyrenees, France</title>
<author wicri:is="90%">
<name sortKey="Lorand, J P" sort="Lorand, J P" uniqKey="Lorand J" first="J P." last="Lorand">J P. Lorand</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:11C6AD768DA78FAA05D5DE9F359A52301631A050</idno>
<date when="1989" year="1989">1989</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1093/petrology/30.4.987</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/11C6AD768DA78FAA05D5DE9F359A52301631A050/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000843</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000843</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000506</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000B24</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000B24</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0022-3530:1989:Lorand J:sulfide:petrology:of</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">001316</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">001249</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">001249</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a">Sulfide Petrology of Spinel and Garnet Pyroxenite Layers from Mantle-derived Spinel Lherzolite Massifs of Arieg`, Northeastern Pyrenees, France</title>
<author wicri:is="90%">
<name sortKey="Lorand, J P" sort="Lorand, J P" uniqKey="Lorand J" first="J P." last="Lorand">J P. Lorand</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3">
<country xml:lang="fr">France</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Laboratoire de Minéralogie, Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle de Paris, UA 286, 61 Rue de Buffon, 75005 Paris</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="region" nuts="2">Île-de-France</region>
<settlement type="city">Paris</settlement>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">Journal of Petrology</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3530</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1460-2415</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher>
<date type="published" when="1989-08">1989-08</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">30</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="987">987</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="1015">1015</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3530</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3530</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract">Pyroxenite layers in the orogenic spinel lherzolite massifs of Ariège are porphyroclastic textured and range in composition from spinel websterite to garnet clinopyroxenite. Each pyroxenite type forms individual layers or occurs as part of composite layers in which the Opx/Cpx and Sp/Gt ratios decrease from margins to core. They are interpreted as crystalline segregations separated by flow crystallization from continental tholeiites en route to the surface. The primary magmatic phases consist of Al-rich pyroxenes, together with a minor amount of spinel, which started to crystallize at 1400°C and 20–22 kb pressure; the pyroxenes have locally survived plastic strains and subsolidus rccrystallizations and now occur in the form of clinopyroxene and orthopyroxene megacrysts displaying unmixing features. Although the differentiated silicate liquid was fully expelled during the flow crystallization process, the layered pyroxenites have concentrated the highly incompatible elements S and Cu and locally display significant chalcophile platinum-group element enrichment (Pd, Pt). Cu and S behave coherently over the whole range of pyroxenite composition; their highest concentrations are found in the thinnest websterite layers or at the margin of composite layers. Microscopic investigation of 214 polished thin sections shows these elements to be present as accessory Cu-Fe-Ni sulfides interstitial among the silicate phase or forming discrete bodies included in the relic pyroxene megacrysts. All these features indicate the presence of a sulfide liquid, immiscible with the silicate magma, during the crystallization of the layered pyroxenites. Sulfide liquid immiscibility probably occurred in response to thermal contrast between the pyroxenites and the cooler surrounding peridotites. It is proposed that the megacryst-hosted sulfide inclusions were trapped as linear arrays arranged on host megacryst growth planes. Due to the slow cooling and complex unmixing history of the megacrysts, these arrays have been transformed into coarse, isolated sulfide inclusions by subsolidus migration and spheroidization processes. They started to crystallize at T = 1200°C as monosulfide solid solution (MSS), probably coexisting with a minor amount of Ni- and Cu-rich sulfide liquid down to r=900°C. The reconstruction of the bulk chemistry of each individual inclusion reveals significant between-inclusion variations of Cu/Ni+ Fe and Ni/Fe ratios, which would result from strain-induced immobilization of these liquids. On cooling, the high-temperature MSS has decomposed below 230°C into Ni-rich pyrrhotite, nickeliferous pentlandite, chalcopyrite and minor pyrite. The post-magmatic history of the interstitial sulfide grains was not unlike that of the inclusions, except at near-surface temperatures where the primary sulfides resulting from unmixing of MSS have been partly altered into secondary sulfides by serpentinizing aqueous fluids. In spite of these post-magmatic alterations, the inclusions and the interstitial sulfide phases are remarkably homogeneous as regards their bulk Ni/Cu ratio, which is close to 3. This value is characteristic of sulfide separated from primary rather than partially differentiated tholeiitic melts. It is thus concluded that the continental tholeiite parent to the layered pyroxenites was saturated with sulfides when it left its mantle source regioa In this aspect, it would not be different from MORBs which contain similar sulfide compositions. In both cases, sulfide fractionation cannot be ignored in models for chalcophile trace element fractionation during initial evolution of these magmas.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>France</li>
</country>
<region>
<li>Île-de-France</li>
</region>
<settlement>
<li>Paris</li>
</settlement>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="France">
<region name="Île-de-France">
<name sortKey="Lorand, J P" sort="Lorand, J P" uniqKey="Lorand J" first="J P." last="Lorand">J P. Lorand</name>
</region>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Terre/explor/NickelMaghrebV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001249 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 001249 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Terre
   |area=    NickelMaghrebV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:11C6AD768DA78FAA05D5DE9F359A52301631A050
   |texte=   Sulfide Petrology of Spinel and Garnet Pyroxenite Layers from Mantle-derived Spinel Lherzolite Massifs of Arieg`, Northeastern Pyrenees, France
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.27.
Data generation: Fri Mar 24 23:14:20 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 5 17:03:47 2024